Visual Testing Script Refactoring Strategy¶
Current Architecture Overview¶
Core Components¶
- VisualTester Class
- Responsible for setting up, executing, and tearing down visual tests
-
Key methods:
setup()
: Builds documentation and starts local serverteardown()
: Stops local servercapture_page()
: Takes screenshots of individual pagestest_navigation()
: Performs navigation menu testing
-
Utility Functions
safe_get()
: Defensive value retrievalsafe_evaluate()
: Safe JavaScript evaluationprint_nav_results()
: Result reporting-
YAML and navigation parsing utilities
-
Test Execution Flow
run_tests()
: Async function managing test workflowvisual()
: Typer CLI entry point
Refactoring Recommendations¶
1. Separation of Concerns¶
- Split the monolithic
visual.py
into multiple modules: visual/core.py
: Core testing logicvisual/utils.py
: Utility functionsvisual/cli.py
: Command-line interface
2. Error Handling and Logging¶
- Implement a more robust logging mechanism
- Create custom exception classes for different failure modes
- Add detailed error context and traceability
3. Configuration Management¶
- Move hardcoded values to a configuration file
- Support dynamic configuration for:
- Server settings
- Screenshot parameters
- Timeout values
4. Performance Optimization¶
- Implement parallel page capture with better concurrency control
- Add more granular timeout and retry mechanisms
- Optimize network request handling
5. Testing Strategy Enhancements¶
- Add support for:
- Responsive design testing
- Accessibility checks
- Performance metrics capture
6. Code Quality Improvements¶
- Increase type hints and runtime type checking
- Add comprehensive docstrings
- Implement more defensive programming techniques
Proposed Refactoring Workflow¶
-
Modularization
-
Enhanced Configuration
-
Advanced Error Handling
Performance Metrics and Logging¶
- Track and log:
- Total test duration
- Per-page capture time
- Resource utilization
- Detailed error logs
Future Considerations¶
- Integration with CI/CD pipelines
- Support for multiple browsers
- Machine learning-assisted visual regression testing
Refining Page Capture Strategy¶
Current Challenge¶
Our current page capture mechanism in capture_page_with_advanced_strategy
needs refinement to improve:
- Code readability
- Error handling
- Performance
- Maintainability
Key Observations¶
Complexity Factors¶
- Multiple nested try-except blocks
- Complex retry logic
- Inline configuration for timeout and complexity
Proposed Refactoring Approach¶
Goals¶
- Separate concerns
- Make code more declarative
- Improve error traceability
- Create more testable components
Potential Improvements¶
- Extract timeout calculation logic
- Create explicit error handling strategies
- Use more descriptive variable names
- Implement a clear retry mechanism
Next Steps¶
- Analyze current implementation
- Break down complex logic into smaller functions
- Create clear, single-responsibility methods
- Add comprehensive logging
- Implement robust error tracking
Guiding Principles¶
- Clarity over complexity
- Explicit over implicit
- Testability is key
- Performance matters, but readability first
Conclusion¶
The current visual testing script provides a solid foundation. Refactoring will improve maintainability, performance, and extensibility.